What command philosophy change accompanies the PLA's defense approach?

• A. Centralized rigid command
• B. DECENTRALIZATION — lower-echelon commanders empowered to act on their judgment, particularly during mobile defense when comms may fail
• C. Abolition of mobile defense
• D. Dependence on external allies

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is that the PLA’s defense approach relies on flexible, rapid action at the point of contact, even when communications links are degraded. To make that possible, command authority is pushed down to lower levels so those units can make timely decisions based on the situation on the ground rather than waiting for higher headquarters. This decentralization matches mobile defense, which depends on tempo, initiative, and adaptability—key when you may lose or weaken C2 links. By empowering subordinate leaders to act on their own judgment within a clear overall intent, the force can respond to changing threats, exploit opportunities, and sustain a resilient defense.

Centralized rigid command would slow response and stifle initiative, which is incompatible with mobile defense. Abolishing mobile defense or relying on external allies would undermine the PLA’s goal of self-rereliant, adaptable defense.